Commentaries

The Envestnet Edge, October 2017

Time to stock up on growth or value?

Download the full PDF

Growth stocks, particularly active growth managers, have enjoyed stellar performance so far this year, yet many investors have continued to pour money into exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and bonds. Others are cautious about the continued uptrend in stocks. This month, we examine the underpinnings for why investors choose growth and value stocks. We also observe that although fund flows may indicate a current lack of enthusiasm for stocks in general, the year-to-date growth stock story may persuade investors who missed out to take another look at stocks, and at active growth managers in particular.​

Growth versus value. For many years, that was one of the central debates for investors, analysts, managers, and financial advisors. Growth and value stocks seemed to be the yin and yang of stock investing, with radically different characteristics that attracted investors with different temperaments. Growth, defined as companies measured on the strength of their earnings; value, defined as companies measured on the price of their stock relative to underlying assets. That is a simplistic distillation, but even that has faded in the past few years. Instead, the focus has been on larger questions of whether stocks overall are too dear, bonds still attractive, and markets stable.

This year so far, however, suggests that investors would do well to revisit the question of growth versus value, as well as the related conundrum  of active versus passive, because the spread in how these various categories have performed has been quite dramatic, with wide differences in how investments have performed. If, going forward, returns are less correlated—that is, if stocks and bonds don’t rise and fall en masse but instead result in large differences between individual   stocks and bonds and among specific allocations— then questions like growth versus value will need   to rise to the fore once again.

Growth versus value redux

Investing clichés are common. Some are wise, but are easy to implement only in hindsight: “Buy high. Sell low.” Some are true only when they are true: “Markets climb a wall of worry.” Some are relatively useless, “Buy the rumor. Sell the news.” A few, however, can have some virtue: “When the herd goes one way, you go another.” Well, this year the herd has been yanking money out of actively managed funds and pouring into ETFs and passive vehicles. With stock markets up decently and  bond markets offering little drama, few have been complaining about their returns. But for the first three-quarters of this year, growth stocks have substantially outperformed value stocks. That is true for large caps and small caps, and it is also true for that much-benighted category: active growth stock funds. After some significant struggles relative to their benchmarks over the past years, active growth funds have had stellar performance compared to passive funds that mirror the entire market. The herd has not benefited.

One reason for the outperformance of large-sized growth companies has been the heavy weighting of technology giants, such as Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Facebook, Netflix, Apple and down the list. A good deal of skepticism remains about these markets, and many people are uncomfortable with the continued rise of stocks in general and valuations of some of the names that have propelled this multiyear rally. A recent headline stated baldly: “Why rising optimism should make stock-market investors nervous!” That was hardly an outlier.

Of course, forgotten in that mix are the various times over the past few years when stocks have pulled back sharply, including technology names, as they did in early 2016. In the first month and a half of 2016, the tech-heavy Nasdaq was off nearly 15%. The march has not been straight up, but memories are short, and fears of the past fade quickly in the face of the recent calm in domestic and global markets.

So, it’s not as though tech stocks—let alone stocks in general—have been only up over the past years. This year has certainly had incredibly low volatility and a steady melt upwards of stocks. In addition, even as the Federal Reserve (Fed) has been embarking on a gradual tightening path, bonds have not been roiled as they were in November 2016 after the election, when prices dropped rather suddenly and sharply. The absence of volatility has calmed some, but it has also spooked others who see it not as stability but the proverbial calm before the storm. Seen through that lens, each day stocks do okay is one day closer to the day when they do not.

That may, of course, prove to be the correct lens. Pullbacks and crashes happen, and they usually take most people by surprise. This year, at least, the absence of a sharp retreat explains why many have missed out on the very strong performance of growth stocks. Not only are they dominated by technology names, but they are often pricey in terms of their multiple and valuation.

Growth stocks demand that investors have some real confidence in the future. Indeed, one thing that has long separated growth investors from value investors is temperament. Value investors have been seen as more conservative, more cautious, more aware of the vagaries that can quickly undermine the hot new name and the sexy new trend. Growth investors have been seen as flashier, more risk-prone, more focused on what could be than on what is. After all, you don’t invest in a company growing quickly and innovating and disrupting if you don’t believe that the future might be rosy and reward those who take risks.

Today, however, even as some companies are doing spectacularly, the general mood is cautious. According to regular polls by Gallup, most Americans see the country as a whole as being  on the wrong track and are not confident that the world their children will inherit will be better than the present. You can’t draw a specific line from those attitudes to the lack of enthusiasm for growth stocks, but that lack is evident from fund flows, which continue to see investors pouring money out of domestic US equity and into fixed income.

Add to that a general distaste for active investing. Index investors can capture much of the growth stock story, but this year many active funds have captured even more of it. Those funds can take even  larger  positions  in  high-conviction  companies, as opposed to an index fund, which has fixed weightings  (albeit  periodically  rebalanced). In some years, that doesn’t work so well, as active managers take outsized positions (relative to the benchmark) that underperform. This year has been a good one for skilled active stock pickers, but a rough few years of late does explain why so many investors have been reluctant to put money with active managers, let alone with growth managers, and let alone with stocks. In order of confidence about the future and willingness to take risk, active growth managers are further along the curve. Yes, investors who pile into “safe,” low-yielding fixed income are taking risks that their portfolios will not live up to retirement needs and expectations; psychologically, however, in uncertain times, the knee-jerk tendency is to default to what has been safe in the past, whether or not that is the most prudent decision going forward.

And so, we have a year that has rewarded active growth managers and anyone who has invested in growth stocks, passive or active. Given fund flows and sentiment, it is also a year that many peoplehave missed. If investing clichés hold, it may be that more investors will turn to growth stocks going forward in light of how well they have done, which might be precisely when that outperformance fades. Who knows? The fundamentals of many of the companies in those growth portfolios remain strong, with potent revenue and earnings growth, and that, at the very least, suggests reasons for paying attention to an area of the market that has been performing strongly.

October Takeaway:

Growth stocks, particularly active growth managers, have had a good run this year, despite investors’ continued overwhelming penchant for ETFs and bonds. Not all investors have benefited. Some are cautious, perceiving the lack of volatility as the calm before the storm, coupled with high prices for technology-dominated names, as rationalization for fund flows out of equities and into fixed income. But a proper focus on strong revenue and earnings growth fundamentals may justify paying close attention to growth companies going forward, and active growth managers in particular. Not following the herd may prove to be a good investment maxim over time.

INDEX DISCLOSURES: The MSCI EAFE Growth Index captures large and mid-cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across Developed Markets countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. The growth investment style characteristics for index construction are defined using five variables: long-term forward EPS growth rate, short-term forward EPS growth rate, current internal growth rate and long-term historical EPS growth trend and long-term historical sales per share growth trend. The MSCI EAFE Value Index captures large and mid-cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across Developed Markets countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. The value investment style characteristics for index construction are defined using three variables: book value to price, 12-month forward earnings to price and dividend yield. The Russell 1000 Value Index is a subset of the Russell 1000 Index and includes stocks with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth rates. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is a subset of the Russell 1000 index and includes companies that exhibit higher price-to-book and forecasted earnings.

Russell 2000 Value Index is a subset of the Russell 2000 Index and includes stocks with lower price to-book ratios and lower expected growth rates. Russell 2000 Growth Index is a subset of the Russell 2000 index and includes companies that exhibit higher price-to-book and forecasted earnings. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this commentary is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and their returns assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet | PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet | PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Featuring

Zachary Karabell
Head of Global Strategies, Envestnet, Inc., Consultant to Investment Committee*

Articles By This Author

Webinar Replay: 2018 Market Outlook The Envestnet Edge, December 2017 Video: Bitcoin, Bubbles, and the Bigger Picture The Envestnet Edge, November 2017 Video: Taxes are certain, but don't obsess about tax reform The Envestnet Edge, October 2017 Video: Time to stock up on growth or value? The Envestnet Edge, September 2017 Video: Time To Take A (Measured) Risk? The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2017 Video: Bitcoin: Buy Or Buyer Beware? The Envestnet Edge, June 2017 Video: FANG, FAAMG: Too Big a Bite of the Market? The Envestnet Edge, May 2017 Video: Invest "As If" The Envestnet Edge, April 2017 Video: What To Do In Quiet Markets The Envestnet Edge, March 2017 Video: Bull Or Bear: Should Investors Still Care? PMC Weekly Review - March 10, 2017 The Envestnet Edge, February 2017 Video: Separating markets from politics, is it really a "Trump rally"? The Envestnet Edge, January 2017 Video: Investing in Trump’s Economy? Proceed With Caution The Envestnet Edge, December 2016 Video: Have We Only Just Begun? The Envestnet Edge, November 2016 Video: Rotations, Reversals, Rising Rates: A Time to Reposition Post-Election, Will Markets and Portfolios Emerge Winners or Losers? Webinar Replay: Post-Election Winners and Losers The Envestnet Edge, October 2016 Video: In a 2-2-2 world, look for modest economic growth and expansion PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, September 2016 Video: Diversification is working in 2016 (so far) The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2016 Video: Valuations: it's all relative Brexit: Plunging into the Unknown? The Envestnet Edge, June 2016 Video: Equity valuations and bond yields: reach no further PMC Weekly Review - June 17, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, May 2016 Video: Hitting singles: a measured approach for this investing season The Envestnet Edge, April 2016 Video: Investing with impact: increasingly a matter-of-fact Video: In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers? The Envestnet Edge, March 2016 PMC Weekly Review - March 11, 2016 Video: In a low-growth world, less could be more The Envestnet Edge, February 2016 The Envestnet Edge, January 2016 Video: Markets are a mess, but don't jump to conclusions yet A Most Challenging Year Video: Interest Rates and Energy: The Highs and Lows of Year-End The Envestnet Edge, December 2015 The Envestnet Edge, November 2015 Video: We'll always have Paris The Envestnet Edge, October 2015 Video: Politics and the markets: déjà vu all over again? Video: China, Commodities, and Crisis: What's Next for Emerging Markets? The Envestnet Edge, September 2015 PMC Weekly Review - September 11, 2015 Is This The Big One (Financially Speaking)? Probably Not. The Envestnet Edge, August 2015 Video: In a "meh" market, look again at U.S. stocks The Envestnet Edge, July 2015 Video: Is this the Big One? What to do in a financial crisis Don't Worry About China Don’t Believe the Hype About Greece The Greek Catastrophe Is Finally Here (Unless It Isn’t) The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2015 Video: When Following the Herd is Risky, Where is the Safety? The Envestnet Edge, April 2015 Video: The End of Short-Termism is Long Overdue PMC Weekly Review - April 24, 2015 The Envestnet Edge, March 2015 Video: Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisor Closer Video: The Return of the Comeback: Is 2015 the Year for International Stocks? The Envestnet Edge, February 2015 PMC Weekly Review - February 13, 2015 Why the Jobs Report Means Diddly Don’t Turn America Into Europe PMC Weekly Review - January 23, 2015 Video: Active and Passive: The Yin and Yang of Investing The Envestnet Edge, January 2015 PMC Weekly Review - January 9, 2015 Will Politics in 2015 Catch Up with the Economy? Video: Our Perspective on 2015: Maintain Yours The Envestnet Edge, December 2014 PMC Market Commentary: December 12, 2014 No, This Is NOT the '90s Economy Again PMC Market Commentary: November 14, 2014 Video: 2014 U.S. Midterms: A Win for Stocks? The Envestnet Edge, November 2014 Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016? PMC Market Commentary: October 17, 2014 Video: Special Video Commentary: Market Volatility and Fundamentals The Envestnet Edge, October 2014 Video: You Know What’s Not Sustainable? Ignoring the Opportunity in Impact Investing Don’t Panic! PMC Market Commentary: October 10, 2014 Greenberg’s Folly Naomi Klein Is Wrong PMC Market Commentary: September 26, 2014 Subprime Loans Are Back! Video: When it Comes to Interest Rates, Who Says What Comes Down Must Go Up? The Envestnet Edge, September 2014 PMC Market Commentary: September 12, 2014 Why Indie Bookstores Are on the Rise Again The Fed Is Not As Powerful As We Think PMC Market Commentary: August 22, 2014 Americans' Sour Mood on the Economy Doesn't Square with the Fact The Envestnet Edge, August 2014 Video: The World is in Crisis... the Markets are not PMC Market Commentary: August 8, 2014 PMC Market Commentary: July 25, 2014 Punitive Damages Video: Market Valuations and The Theory of Relativity The Envestnet Edge, July 2014 Don’t Kill the Export-Import Bank. Clone It. How India’s Economic Rise Could Bolster America’s Economy Video: Separating Risk from Reality PMC Market Commentary: June 27, 2014 No Sex Please, We're French PMC Market Commentary: June 13, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, June 2014 PMC Weekly Market Review, May 23, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, May 2014 Don't Bet on Rising Wages PMC Market Commentary: May 9, 2014 The Sharing Economy: Why Are So Many So Afraid? PMC Market Commentary: April 25, 2014 The Obsession with CEO Pay Won't Help the Middle Class PMC Market Commentary: April 11, 2014 Time to Face Reality: Our Unemployment Problems Are Structural PMC Market Commentary: March 28, 2014 In Defense of Relentless Optimism The "Made in China" Fallacy Forget GDP - Use Big Data