Commentaries

PMC Weekly Review - June 16, 2017

A Macro View: U.S. Federal Reserve – The Path to Normalization

This week, the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank concluded its two-day policy meeting by voting to raise the federal funds target rate by 0.25%, bringing it to a range of 1% to 1.25%. This is the second rate hike this year, and the fourth consecutive hike over the past year and a half. Additionally, the Fed stated that it will begin to normalize the balance sheet later this year, once it is appropriate to do so. The Fed plans to reduce reinvestment in treasuries and mortgage securities by $10 billion a month, and will increase it by $10 billion every three months until it reaches a max of $50 billion.

In light of this week’s decision, it is helpful to review the Fed’s dual mandate that governs the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) decisions. By law, the Fed is charged with achieving both stable prices and maximum sustainable employment. The FOMC has identified 2% inflation as being most consistent with its price-stability mandate. The sustainable-employment mandate is more complex, as the labor market is affected by many factors. The FOMC employs a moving target, consisting of its participants' estimates of a longer-run normal rate of unemployment consistent with the employment mandate. This week’s Summary of Economic Projections shows the FOMC participants’ median estimate of the longer-run unemployment rate is 4.6%, with unemployment expected to fall to 4.2% to 4.3% for the year, down from the prior projection of 4.5% to 4.6%.

The Fed is more optimistic about the economy, as it expects real GDP to grow 2.1% to 2.2% in 2017, compared to its previous projection of 2.0% to 2.2%. The Fed also forecasts inflation of 1.6% to 1.7% in 2017, below its earlier projections of 1.8% to 1.9%. 

Although the market anticipated this rate hike decision, the focus now is on what the Fed will do in the coming months. According to its projected policy path, the Fed plans one more rate hike this year and three more in 2018, bringing the fed funds rate to 2.1%. Despite its best efforts, there is concern that the Fed won’t be able to execute as outlined, due to declining inflation. In May, the year-over-year core inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), slowed for the fourth straight month, to 1.7%. Given this change, there is increased skepticism of an additional rate hike this year.

By many measures, the US economy is late in the business cycle’s expansion phase. The current expansion began in June 2009, and is now eight years in. History suggests that a recession may be looming on the horizon. During previous economic recessions, the Fed needed to reduce the fed funds rate 3% to 4% to stimulate economic growth. The current state of monetary policy implies the Fed would be ill equipped to respond should a recession begin today. For this reason, it is important for the fed funds rate to normalize, giving policy makers room to support the economy during the next contraction. However, the path to normalization must be managed carefully to ensure that the Fed’s changing monetary policy does not cause the next contraction. Fed critics doubt its ability to chart a successful course to normalized rates. Given the current environment of markets and the economy, it’s of little surprise that investors pay such close attention to the Fed.

Download the full PDF

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2017 Envestnet. All rights reserved.

Featuring

Scott Keller
Associate Portfolio Manager

Articles By This Author

PMC Weekly Review - June 16, 2017