Commentaries

PMC Weekly Review – March 4, 2019

A Macro View – Has Kraft Heinz’s ketchup stained corporate bonds red?

 “All Good Things (Come To An End).” This 2006 number by Nelly Furtado (a Canadian-Portuguese singer, in case you need a reminder) seems apt when it comes to corporate bond markets these days. In this context, ‘good things’ alludes to the unconventional, ultraloose monetary policy unleashed by global central banks in the aftermath of the global financial crisis that began in 2008 The total outstanding nonfinancial global corporate debt touched $13 trillion1 as of the end of 2018, of which US nonfinancial corporate debt accounted for roughly $6.2 trillion2. When US corporate bond markets sold off in Q42018, this high debt level came back into focus. More recently, a dovish Federal Reserve’s (Fed) decision to pause its rate-raising campaign resulted in a sharp V-shaped recovery in the debt markets. However, the froth of excess leverage keeps seeping from the market from time to time. This time, the froth spilled out of the bottle of one of Warren Buffett’s and America’s favorite ketchup brands and consumer staples giant, Kraft Heinz.

Last Friday, Kraft Heinz (KHC) spooked the market with its disappointing fourth-quarter results and guidance. The company also wrote down $15.4 billion of assets related to its Kraft and Oscar Mayer brands, and disclosed an ongoing SEC investigation about its accounting practices. KHC, which carries a long-term credit rating of BBB, also announced a dividend cut. The company’s stock plummeted 27% that day. High leverage coupled with poor management execution were the main reasons highlighted for the stock’s sell-off. KHC’s balance sheet is loaded with $30 billion3 worth of long-term debt, which is the combined result of Heinz’s 2013 move to take the company private and the 2015 merger between Kraft and Heinz. KHC is a good example of a likely scenario in which some large US nonfinancial firms may find it difficult to grow their earnings enough to meet interest rate obligations on their debt. The situation could get more complicated if economic growth slows down in 2019. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway posted a $25 billion4 loss in Q42018 primarily due to the write-down of its stake in KHC. This points to the potential challenges in valuing these large companies, even for seasoned investors.

The KHC debacle also underscores the potential risks of large-scale downgrades in the lower credit sleeves of the investment grade spectrum. It is estimated that BBB-rated companies (like KHC) form around 50% of the investment grade bond market. The cost of servicing this debt also has increased for these companies as interest rates have risen. Even though the Fed is currently being more “patient,” a slowdown in earnings growth has acted as a headwind for many of these companies. With the prolonged credit cycle potentially on its last leg, investors must keep in mind that BBB-rated bonds are most vulnerable to falling into “junk” status. Given the sheer size of the BBB market, investors should not be surprised if they witness a large number of downgrades comparable to 2008. Morgan Stanley5, through its implied ratings, estimates that around 55% of BBB debt will be rated “junk” if the rating is based on leverage alone, and 31% of BBB debt will have leverage at or above 4.0x. In case of a recession, drawdowns might be accentuated by passive strategies like index mutual funds and ETFs, which will be forced to sell because these downgraded credits no longer align with the benchmark.

Despite the alarmingly high risks of excessive leverage in the corporate balance sheet, all is not lost yet. Companies like KHC have acknowledged the problem and have taken steps to pay down their debt. For example, KHC is considering potential asset sales, and using the proceeds, along with savings from dividend cuts, to clean up the balance sheet. However, the market is expressing its fair share of doubt on whether this step will have any material impact on the company’s leverage ratios.

Even though the ‘Fed pause’ has led to a relief rally in the high yield and investment grade corporate bond market, investors must be prepared for higher volatility going forward. Any company-specific headline related to leverage levels can be expected to create tremors in the broader corporate bond marketplace. On the positive side, sporadic sell-offs present potentially attractive credit selection opportunities for active managers, provided they have ‘dry powder’ to deploy.

So even though “all good things come to an end,” the end of the credit cycle might not be as painful as 2008, if companies take the right steps to reduce their debt to much more manageable levels and investors continue to access these markets through solid managers.

Navaneeth Krishnan
Investment Analyst

Download the full PDF

Sources:

1) http://www.oecd.org/corporate/Corporate-Bond-Markets-in-a-Time-of-Unconventional-Monetary-Policy.pdf
2) Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Economic Research https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/NCBDBIQ027S
3) SEC filings 8K: http://ir.kraftheinzcompany.com/static-files/3b5d2adb-ff26-41c5-8594-a9d475cc3613
4) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-24/buffett-s-stock-losses-and-key-takeaways-from-berkshire-results
5) https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/fixed-income-advisory-committee/morgan-stanley-nature-of-the-bbbeast.pdf

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2019 Envestnet. All rights reserved.