PMC Weekly Review - January 30, 2015
Largely due to the price wars among major world oil producing countries, the crude oil price has tumbled more than 50% since last summer. The magnitude of the drop within such a short period is astounding and has caused great confusion regarding its impact. How will it affect different sectors and companies? Is it overall a good or bad thing for investors?
There is no doubt that plunging oil prices is a disaster for the energy sector. Hailed and embraced by many as a revolutionary growth sector for decades to come in recent years, the sector may suffer as much as the technology sector experienced during the aftermath of the explosion of dot com bubble. However, the damage might not be contained to the energy sector, currently only 8% of the S&P 500 Index. Industrial companies that supply equipment to energy companies may suffer, financial companies that lend money to the energy sector may suffer, lodging and leisure companies that serve mostly the energy companies may suffer, etc. Some quintessential American industrial companies have already mentioned their exposure to the energy sector as a source of disappointment in their recent earnings release and more may come if oil prices keep plunging or simply stay at current levels.
There is no doubt either that plunging oil prices should boost consumer spending and thus the companies could benefit from rising consumer demand. However, compared with the damage to the energy companies that is swift and relatively easy to quantify, there is a delayed effect on consumer behavior and it is far more challenging to quantify the benefit. Corporate America, especially the energy companies, is the most capitalist and efficient entity on earth. Energy companies essentially drill for profit/money not for oil and they have already reacted to plunging oil price through merger & acquisition, cut in spending and mass layoffs. Unlike Corporate America, consumers do not react to oil prices in real time. Just because a consumer saves $100 last month on gasoline does not mean they will “pre-spend” $1,200 projected savings of next year or even spend $100 more next month. The average consumer probably has not figured out the amount of the savings or does not even bother to do so yet. Plus, they might be skeptical on how long oil prices will stay low. It takes time for consumers to change their spending behavior and boost their spending even if they are convinced that low oil prices are here to stay.
It is even trickier for companies that may potentially benefit from rise in consumer demand to figure out the exact benefit. Consumer discretionary companies in theory are the biggest beneficiaries of plunging oil prices, as consumers can spend their gas savings on things like restaurants, clothes, etc. However, this is also a very competitive sector and gaining advantages over their competition is far more important than how to benefit from macro factors, such as lower gasoline prices. That is why while energy companies and other potential “victims” of plunging oil prices are busy slashing their earnings projections, very few potential “beneficiaries” advertise their good fortune.
In conclusion, the damage of plunging oil prices to the affected companies is generally front-ended and relatively easy to quantify. The potential benefit is more back-ended (the time lag effect) and difficult to discern. While low oil prices are a net positive for the U.S. economy and companies, especially in the long run, the sudden change is likely to cause confusion and turmoil in the short term.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2015 Envestnet. All rights reserved.