PMC Weekly Review - May 22, 2015
Japan’s first quarter real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth was estimated at 0.6% Wednesday, and unexpectedly beat economists’ forecasts. On the surface, this week’s reading is a welcomed surprise, as the world’s third largest economy posted underwhelming GDP data in two of the previous three quarters. The 2.4% annualized figure outpaced the 1.5% consensus expectation by an impressive margin, and contributed to the Nikkei Index reaching its highest level in nearly 15 years.
Over the past few years, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Bank of Japan (BOJ) Governor Haruhiko Kuroda have used both monetary and fiscal policies to improve Japan’s economic health. The most drastic measure implemented was a policy of quantitative and qualitative monetary easing, which was launched in 2013 and expanded in 2014. This stimulus, more extreme than the programs employed by both the U.S. Federal Reserve and European Central Bank, included the qualitative aspect of BOJ’s purchase of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and real estate investment trusts (REITS )in addition to government bonds. Although this most recent GDP reading is viewed generally as a step in the right direction, and has somewhat vindicated the efforts of Prime Minister Abe and the BOJ, others warn much more work is needed before the Japanese economy is back on track and easing measures can be tapered.
When breaking down the first quarter of Japan’s GDP figure, significant inventory buildup was the primary driver of the positive surprise. In fact, it represented 0.5% of the 0.6% of quarterly GDP growth—in other words, most of it. The inventory stockpile can be construed as either one of two things: 1) it indicates an expected increase in demand, which is supportive of a growing economy, or 2) the rise in unsold goods could mean weak demand, and production is outpacing consumption. Many support the latter case, due to the minimal real wage growth over the past two years, which could lead to disappointing GDP in subsequent quarters. Furthermore, several recent initial GDP readings were revised downward in the months following their releases (as was the case with fourth quarter 2014 when growth was revised from 2.2% to 1.1% annualized). Over the past few years, Japan’s economy has had difficulty sustaining positive momentum, and many contend that demographic dynamics and successfully implementing structural reforms—the ‘Third Arrow’ of Abenomics—are longer-term headwinds.
Although there are potential pitfalls with the GDP surprise, evidence suggests that the stimulus put in place by the BOJ is having a positive effect on the Japanese economy, and could lead to a healthy and sustainable growth rate moving forward. Most notably, the Japanese yen has depreciated as a result of the aggressive easing policy, providing a meaningful tailwind for exports. Exports had successive quarter-on-quarter increases (rising 3.2% in the fourth quarter and expanding 2.4% in the first quarter), and corporate profits have risen. Another bright spot is growing investment in new housing (up 1.8% in the first quarter over the prior quarter, which was the first increase in a year). In addition, regulatory reforms have promoted the redevelopment of areas with older, unoccupied homes. Lastly, capital spending was another important contributor to the GDP expansion. In recent years Japanese companies had moved production abroad, but the weakness of the yen has made domestic production less expensive, and corporations have begun re-investing at home.
What does all this mean? In dissecting the data, some elements signal the economy is on its way to recovery, while others suggest more work is required before Japan is out of the weeds. One thing that is definitive—Japan is the third largest economy in the world, and its impact on global markets is significant. A growing Japan would benefit other Asian economies, particularly in light of China’s slowdown. The central bank policy board’s multi-day meeting concludes at the end of this week, but many economists anticipate there will be little or no immediate material action taken. Disputes about how to infer economic data are common in the investment world, and are particularly so now, with divided interpretations of Japan’s first quarter GDP report. However, there is widespread consensus that second quarter numbers will shed light on whether Japan is in a state of recovery or continues to lack the necessary core strength to generate forward momentum.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2015 Envestnet. All rights reserved.