PMC Weekly Review – October 12, 2018
Through the first three quarters of the year, the US municipal market has outperformed the taxable market across the yield curve. The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is down 40 basis points through September, whereas the Aggregate Bond Index is down 1.60% and the US Treasury Index is down 1.67%. At the short end of the yield curve, the 1-3 Year Municipal Index is up 88 basis points, and the 1-3 Year Aggregate Index is up just 42 basis points. In long maturities, the 22+ year Municipal Index is down 1.13%, but the 20+ year Treasury Index is down 5.92%. Even in the noninvestment grade space, one of the few highlights in the taxable fixed income markets this year, the Municipal High Yield Index is up 4.45% through the end of the third quarter compared with just 2.57% for the Corporate High Yield Index. Although it is not at all unusual for the muni market to outperform the taxable market (2018 would be the seventh time in the last ten years the Municipal Index outperformed the Aggregate), the reasons for this year’s outperformance are almost entirely technical factors rather than improving credit fundamentals, and this has implications for 2019 and beyond.
Most of the factors for the municipal market’s outperformance this year stem from the tax reform bill passed at the end of 2017. One major provision of that bill eliminated the ability for municipal bonds issued after the end of 2017 to be “prerefunded,” or refinanced at a lower rate. This provision was announced prior to the bill’s actual passage by Congress, which spurred an enormous amount of issuance in late November and early December of last year to qualify for prerefunding in the future. It had the secondary effect of sharply reducing the amount of new issuance in the first quarter of the year. This was particularly pronounced in January, as most municipal bonds make their semiannual coupon payments in December or January, creating a significant demand for reinvestment. New issuance has remained well below average through the first nine months of the year. In fact, net issuance (new bonds issued minus bonds reaching final maturity) was negative from June through August and only barely positive in September. Meanwhile, more than $12 billion has flowed into municipal bond mutual funds of all types so far this year, creating a dramatic supply/demand imbalance. This has driven prices up, yields down (particularly in the short end of the curve), and created much of the year’s outperformance.
A secondary provision in the tax reform bill was a cap on taxpayers’ ability to deduct state and local income taxes paid (including property taxes) from their federal taxable income. This has had the effect of making national muni bond portfolios less attractive for taxpayers in states with high income and/or property taxes (such as California and New York, among others). California residents have poured nearly $1.5 billion into California-specific intermediate municipal bond funds. Other state-specific funds have not had flows like this, but that could change in early 2019 as taxpayers face suddenly higher tax bills.
Finally, in what might be a positive for the municipal market in the coming years, the sharp drop in the corporate tax rate has changed the valuation equation for institutional investors, particularly pension funds and property and casualty insurance companies. These institutions are the overwhelming majority of buyers of long maturity bonds (those without call provisions or limited probability of being refinanced). But with a sharply lower tax rate, current municipal bond issuance does not make sense for them on an after-tax basis. Removing this major source of demand in the long end of the curve is one reason the municipal curve is actually steeper on a 2/30 basis this year, whereas the taxable curve is significantly flatter. This may be a positive situation for the municipal market in 2019 and beyond, as these institutions have billions of dollars of bonds to sell into the market and could be a very necessary source of supply if new issuance doesn’t pick up
Because the municipal market’s outperformance this year has been almost entirely due to technical factors, which are generally more transient than credit-related events, municipals easily could give that advantage back next year, through either a surge in supply or a drop in demand (simply due to the tight credit spreads and lower yields), or both. This presents a much bigger risk factor for investors, even if the professional consensus is for this imbalance to continue well into 2019.
Senior Vice President, Investment Research
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2018 Envestnet. All rights reserved.